Interesting things these SMS Protected Distribution Points are...
Not sure if this is mentioned anywhere, but when you create a SMS Protected Distribution Point (PDP) with no boundaries, it seems to default itself as a Distribution Point (DP) for the subnet that it is located on.
For example, if the server has an IP Address of 192.168.1.25 /24, the server becomes a DP for 192.168.1.0 even w/ no boundaries defined. Until a boundary is defined, the server is just considered a DP for 192.168.1.0. When a boundary is defined, then the server is marked as a PDP. Interestingly enough, even if the defined boundary is 192.168.2.0, the server then becomes a PDP for both 192.168.2.0 and 192.168.1.0.
This is at least what I have experienced/observed from SMS 2003 SP3, the DPInfo table, and Swimage in SQL.
[Update]: This may be a Swimage related issue only. Swimage may only be looking at the IPSubnets column of the DPInfo table to determine which DP it should pull it's packages from.
For example, if the server has an IP Address of 192.168.1.25 /24, the server becomes a DP for 192.168.1.0 even w/ no boundaries defined. Until a boundary is defined, the server is just considered a DP for 192.168.1.0. When a boundary is defined, then the server is marked as a PDP. Interestingly enough, even if the defined boundary is 192.168.2.0, the server then becomes a PDP for both 192.168.2.0 and 192.168.1.0.
This is at least what I have experienced/observed from SMS 2003 SP3, the DPInfo table, and Swimage in SQL.
[Update]: This may be a Swimage related issue only. Swimage may only be looking at the IPSubnets column of the DPInfo table to determine which DP it should pull it's packages from.
Comments